Opinion | This Statistic Could Be Distorting How We Think About Inflation


Preston Mui earned his doctorate in economics from the College of California, Berkeley, simply final 12 months, however he’s already making waves. This month he referred to as out among the largest names in economics and policymaking in a weblog submit.

Mui wrote that economists and policymakers are making an excessive amount of of 1 broadly adopted statistic: the unit labor value, which is meant to symbolize how a lot enterprise has to spend for labor to supply one unit of output. Rising unit labor prices are mentioned to contribute to inflation.

“Claims about inflation rooted in unit labor value arguments are trivial, tautological or unsupported by the information; they’re the emperor that has no garments,” wrote Mui, who’s a senior economist at Make use of America, a analysis and advocacy group preventing for full employment.

Mui linked to 2 outstanding Harvard economists, Lawrence Summers and Jason Furman, who’ve expressed concern about excessive inflation, and named Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Financial institution, whose job is to pull Europe’s inflation charge again down. In a June 15 information convention, Lagarde cited unit labor prices 5 instances. When requested why the central financial institution had revised its inflation expectations upward, she mentioned, “The big a part of it’s the unit labor value.”

Equally, Jerome Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve, cited unit labor prices within the footnote of a 2021 speech, writing that “finally” a persistent rise in unit labor prices adjusted for inflation “will put upward stress on costs.”

On one degree, the intent focus of Lagarde, Powell, the Harvard economists and others on unit labor prices is cheap. It’s basic math: Unit labor prices rise when the quantity that staff are paid goes up quicker than their output does. That looks like a recipe for wage-driven inflation.

Mui acknowledges as a lot: Within the textbook image of the world, “Labor is utilized in manufacturing, excessive labor prices means manufacturing is dear, and dear manufacturing results in greater costs.”

However Mui mentioned the obvious causal hyperlink between unit labor prices and inflation is way weaker when you perceive how the statistical sausage is made. It’s trustworthy however crude. One of many two inputs into the calculation is inflation itself. So if inflation rises and nothing else modifications, the unit labor value will go up. By definition.

“Within the postpandemic period, the rise in unit labor prices is sort of solely defined by progress within the deflator,” which is a measure of the worth degree, Mui wrote. A lot for grasping staff.

Mui admitted that inflation isn’t the one issue within the calculation. Unit labor prices additionally rise if labor grows as a share of nationwide revenue. That can occur if labor compensation (wages, salaries, advantages) grows quicker than earnings. That occurred early within the pandemic, nevertheless it didn’t final.

“The labor share has since fallen and is actually again to 2019 ranges,” Mui wrote. “In historic context, it’s onerous to take a look at labor shares and conclude that compensation is simply too excessive relative to output.”

In any case, Mui wrote, it requires “some heroic assumptions” to attach the labor share of gross home product to what issues for inflation, particularly the price of hiring further staff (or the marginal value of labor, as economists name it). He wrote that it could be “not out of the historic norm” for the labor share to rise with out inflicting inflation to rise.

I requested among the individuals whom Mui referred to as out for his or her response. Furman, who was the chair of President Barack Obama’s Council of Financial Advisers, mentioned, “I’m actually not saying there’s a causal arrow from unit labor prices to inflation. It goes each methods.” He additionally mentioned that the measurement of unit labor prices might be “imperfect.” However he mentioned that “each measure of wage progress we have now is operating quicker than earlier than the pandemic” and that “productiveness has been fairly crappy,” so it’s onerous to think about that rising unit labor prices aren’t at the least partly chargeable for excessive inflation.

Summers, via a spokeswoman, declined to remark for the file, as did the Federal Reserve and the European Central Financial institution. The E.C.B.’s web site has speeches by Lagarde and others highlighting different causes of inflation, notably wider revenue margins.

When the pandemic hit, we noticed wages and inflation go up. It’s onerous to make sure whether or not wages drove up costs or costs drove up wages or some mixture of the 2 occurred. As a senior economist for a pro-labor analysis and advocacy group, Mui is understandably within the camp of blaming inflation, not staff’ wage calls for. On the very least, I believe he has made case that rising unit labor prices aren’t prima facie proof of wage-driven inflation.


There was “a steepening downturn in international commerce” in June, Chris Williamson, the chief enterprise economist of S&P International Market Intelligence in London, wrote on Friday. In manufacturing, new export orders fell in June for the sixteenth straight month. India, Thailand and the Philippines have been the one nations with “noteworthy” positive aspects in manufacturing exports, Williamson wrote. Companies exports grew however not at Might’s speedy tempo. “The downturn in international equipment exports is especially regarding, as such a decline sometimes indicators diminished funding spending,” he wrote.


The golf hyperlinks lie so close to the mill
That nearly every single day
The laboring kids can look out
And see the lads at play

— Sarah Norcliffe Cleghorn, “The Golf Hyperlinks Lie So Close to the Mill” in “Portraits and Protests” (1917)