Opinion | Affirmative Action Is Dead. Campus Diversity Doesn’t Have to Be.

The New York Instances Audio app contains podcasts and narrated articles from the newsroom and different publishers, in addition to unique new exhibits which we’re making accessible to readers for a restricted time. Obtain the audio app right here.

The Supreme Court docket has ended affirmative motion, which means faculties and universities could not take into account race within the admissions course of. For the Opinion columnist David Brooks, the choice opens the door to rethinking the whole school admissions course of, which he argues has traditionally favored college students from rich backgrounds.

Take heed to his audio essay under. A transcript follows.

DAVID BROOKS: I’m David Brooks. I’m a columnist for The New York Instances. I write about politics. I write about sociology. I write about no matter appears fascinating to me that week.

We’ve been debating affirmative motion since I used to be in diapers, and more and more the Supreme Court docket has gotten into this concern, and now it has dominated principally to get rid of racial preferences in school admissions.

On the entire, I’m in all probability unhappy that affirmative motion goes away, however I’m hopeful that we are able to make the most of this second, whether or not we’re offended about it or pleased about it, to suppose in a a lot greater manner about who ought to get into what colleges. I believe it’s time for us to step again and have a look at the entire system and actually produce a system that will probably be truthful to college students from no matter background.

[MUSIC]

So within the Fifties, Harvard College determined they weren’t simply going to simply accept the sons of the elite. They wanted to simply accept the individuals who have been smarter, frankly, and from a broader swath of American society. In order that they determined: We’re going to take G.P.A. far more significantly, and we’re going to take the SAT check far more significantly, and everyone will be capable of get in so long as they qualify.

A number of many years later, they haven’t gotten rid of the elite; they’ve simply swapped out one elite for one more elite. Harvard and different colleges during the last 50 or 60 years have made the competitors to get in ferocious. And if you happen to grew up in an upper-middle-class residence together with your dad and mom investing tens of hundreds of {dollars} in your upbringing, you simply have a leg up over children whose dad and mom can’t afford to make these sorts of investments.

So we’ve wound up with a system the place wealthy children dominate elite colleges. There was analysis finished in 2017 by an economist, Raj Chetty, who discovered that college students from households within the high 1 % of earners have been 77 instances as doubtless as poor college students to be admitted to the Ivy League. And also you’ve bought college after college after college the place you’ve bought extra children from households within the high 1 % than households within the backside 60 %.

So these elite locations turn out to be these little islands the place wealthy folks cross down their benefits to their children. They marry one another. They make investments massively of their children. Their children then go to those unique colleges. They transfer to the identical few metro areas. And individuals who don’t develop up in these sorts of resource-rich households are actually left behind. We’ve created a caste society primarily based on who will get into what unique faculties.

[MUSIC]

So I view the faculty admissions course of via my very own private lens. Like everybody else, by at present’s requirements, I wouldn’t qualify for any of the elite colleges. I went to a public highschool outdoors of Philadelphia. I didn’t do significantly properly in highschool. I didn’t graduate within the high third of my class. My G.P.A. was in all probability round a 3.0. And but in these days, the College of Chicago, the place I ended up going, admitted 70 % of the candidates. I used to be fortunate, and I realized to work whereas I used to be in school, and I began doing higher at writing and issues like that. And so I managed to have a really good profession, far more profitable than something I ever anticipated. However I wouldn’t have made it underneath at present’s regime.

As an grownup, I’ve gotten to see the faculty admissions course of from the opposite finish of the spectrum, from a perspective of a professor and in addition from the attitude of a mum or dad. The method will not be solely divisive however doesn’t give folks later in life a good probability to change the trajectory of their life.

[MUSIC]

I believe faculties ought to choose college students holistically. They need to have a look at their grades, they need to have a look at their check scores, however they need to additionally have a look at their resilience. They need to search for instance of kindness and generosity of their lives. After which, properly, we stay in a class-divided society, and so we should always have a system that’s biased a bit towards children who grew up in poorer houses and didn’t have the assets rising up that the richer children had.

There’s a man named Richard Kahlenberg, who, actually for many years now, he’s been arguing that we should always devise a system the place a child rising up in West Virginia or a poor space of New Orleans has the flexibility to compete with a child who grew up in Beverly Hills or Santa Monica or Manhattan. And so he’s constructed fashions of how to do that. These are fashions that colleges like Harvard or the College of North Carolina can use.

And he’s discovered that if you happen to consider issues like “What neighborhood did you develop up in?” “How a lot household wealth do you might have?” you get a category with the identical stage or much more racial variety through the use of the Kahlenberg system than underneath the present system. However you additionally get many, many, many extra first-generation college students whose dad and mom didn’t go to varsity in any respect.

Now that affirmative motion goes away, faculties and universities are a doable future by which they’ve much less numerous lessons. And so the remaining authorized method to make numerous campuses is to do it by class. And it simply appears to me that this second when the Supreme Court docket has shaken up the admissions course of, that is the time to do it.

The Instances is dedicated to publishing a variety of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you concentrate on this or any of our articles. Listed here are some ideas. And right here’s our e-mail: letters@nytimes.com.

Observe The New York Instances Opinion part on Fb, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

This Instances Opinion piece was produced by Sophia Alvarez Boyd. It was edited by Stephanie Joyce and Allison Benedikt. Truth-checking by Kate Sinclair, Mary Marge Locker and Michelle Harris. Authentic music by Carole Sabouraud and Sonia Herrero. Mixing by Carole Sabouraud and Isaac Jones. Particular because of Shannon Busta and Kristina Samulewski.