Johns Hopkins ‘non-man attracted to non-men’ nonsense is an insult to women

Till yesterday, I mistakenly assumed a lesbian was a lady who’s sexually drawn to different ladies.

Definitely, all of the lesbian ladies I’ve ever recognized have additionally labored underneath that large misapprehension.

In spite of everything, they put the “L” into LGTBQ+. (Insincere apologies to anybody offended if I haven’t put sufficient letters or symbols on this ever-growing checklist.)

However it seems we’ve all been fully fallacious.

Johns Hopkins College in Baltimore, considered one of many world’s greatest medical and scientific hubs of educational excellence, determined this week to unilaterally redefine the phrase “lesbian” to be “extra inclusive.”

In its official on-line glossary of LGBTQ+ terminology, it stated a lesbian was “a non-man drawn to non-men.”

It defined: “Whereas previous definitions check with ‘lesbian’ as a lady who’s emotionally, romantically, and/or sexually drawn to different ladies, this up to date definition consists of non-binary individuals who may establish with this label.”

Clearly, this egregious load of disingenuous, virtue-signaling, woke piffle was unhealthy sufficient.

However it will get worse.

How did the identical LGBTQ+ glossary outline a homosexual man?

It stated: “A person who’s emotionally, romantically, sexually, affectionately, or relationally drawn to different males or who identifies as a member of the homosexual neighborhood.”

So, let me get this straight (pun supposed): When you’re a lesbian, you’re a non-man.

When you’re a homosexual man, you’re a person.

However what no person’s allowed to be in the event that they’re homosexual … is a lady.

And this misogynistic rubbish is coming from one of many planet’s supposedly smartest medical brains? Individuals who actually research biology on daily basis of their lives?

Unsurprisingly, this system director of “LGBTQ+ fairness and schooling” at Johns Hopkins College believed to have permitted the adjustments is a transgender girl named Paula Neira.

This isn’t the primary time we’ve seen ladies being erased on this shameful manner, with their very identification and existence sacrificed on the aggressively activist altar of transgender rights.

Up to now few years, there’s been a sinister, creeping linguistic assault on ladies, led by the medical occupation.

Moms have been renamed “birthing individuals,” breastfeeding turned “chest-feeding” and medical bible the Lancet even had a canopy about “our bodies with vaginas.”

Requested to elucidate anatomy, the Cleveland Clinic wrote: “Who has a vagina? People who find themselves assigned feminine at delivery (AFAB) have vaginas.”

And in Britain, our fabled Nationwide Well being Service dropped the phrase “ladies” from its major on-line well being recommendation for girls being handled for cervical, uterine and ovarian cancers — even if ONLY ladies born with biologically feminine our bodies endure from these ailments, as a result of solely ladies have cervixes, wombs and ovaries.

All that is supposedly carried out to trigger much less offense to transgender or non-binary individuals who don’t want to be referred to as ladies.

However what concerning the offense this would possibly trigger precise organic ladies with breasts and vaginas (spoiler alert: that’s all ladies) who DO wish to be referred to as ladies?

The place are THEIR rights in all this?

Predictably, the Johns Hopkins redefinition of “lesbian” sparked indignant anger and widespread mockery on social media.

“Harry Potter” writer J.Okay. Rowling tweeted: “Man: no definition wanted. Non-man (previously generally known as girl): a being definable solely by reference to the male. An absence, a vacuum the place there’s no man-ness.”

In fact, it was the identical J.Okay. Rowling who turned a worldwide hate determine three years in the past when she commented on an article headlined, “Opinion: Making a extra equal post-COVID-19 world for individuals who menstruate” by saying: “Individuals who menstruate. I’m certain there was once a phrase for these individuals. Somebody assist me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”

For that, Rowling was disgracefully abused, threatened and confronted requires her to be canceled.

However she was proper to ridicule such women-eradicating nonsense then, and she or he’s proper to ridicule it once more now.

As Al Jazeera journalist Sonia Gallego tweeted: “Probably the most prestigious universities within the US, Johns Hopkins, is actively destroying the class of ladies — grownup human females. We at the moment are to be known as ‘Non-men.’ I don’t suppose even Margaret Atwood may have imagined this.”

Amid the furor, Johns Hopkins College took down the glossary yesterday and issued an announcement saying: “Johns Hopkins strives to create a campus tradition that’s inclusive and welcoming for all gender identities, sexual orientations, experiences and viewpoints, and we’re dedicated to making sure Johns Hopkins is a spot the place LGBTQ individuals really feel supported.

“The LGBTQ Glossary serves as an introduction to the vary of identities and phrases which are used inside LGBTQ communities and isn’t supposed to function the definitive solutions as to how all individuals perceive or use these phrases. We’ve got eliminated the web page from our web site whereas we collect extra info.”

Extra details about what?

A lady’s a lady, a lesbian’s a lesbian.

And Johns Hopkins College ought to kinda know this already as a result of it’s speculated to be a middle of medical experience!

The irony of the college’s weasel-worded backtrack is that by attempting to be supposedly “inclusive and welcoming” to transgender and non-binary individuals, Johns Hopkins actually excluded and unwelcomed billions of ladies.

And as soon as once more, this imbecilic, woke claptrap has carried out extra hurt than good.

Dr. Irwin Redlener, president emeritus of the Youngsters’s Well being Fund, not too long ago advised the New York Instances that these kinds of linguistic interventions mirror “liberals going overboard to create definitions and divisions.”

He added: “It truly exacerbates divisions fairly than engaging in one thing helpful.”

Precisely.

And for those who don’t totally grasp the issue, right here’s a easy take a look at: Go as much as Megan Rapinoe, Martina Navratilova or Cynthia Nixon, name them a “non-man,” and see what occurs …