Federalist Society Panel on “Discussion, Coercion, and the Pursuit of Truth” at Law Schools
This is the outline:
Latest occasions at plenty of regulation colleges have raised considerations about civility and respect for opposing views. Many regulation colleges have expressed their dedication to “fostering an atmosphere that values the free expression of concepts,” and have promised “penalties” for disruptive conduct, together with Yale Regulation Faculty. However are present insurance policies and practices successfully enforced and as much as the duty? Are regulation colleges creating an atmosphere that encourages the free dialogue of concepts?
Do regulation colleges owe their college students a grounding in civility, a follow endorsed by bar associations all through the nation? Does tolerance of disruptive conduct and bullying battle with these colleges’ dedication to fostering an atmosphere that helps free expression? If regulation colleges fail to show college students to interact respectfully with one another, or to understand various views on essential questions, the place will college students study it? Has tolerance for ideological coercion on campus turned regulation colleges into a casual coaching floor for future dangerous conduct that bar associations and courts must police?
Our consultants addressed these and different essential points that relate to the position of regulation colleges in selling civility, a follow that future legal professionals might be anticipated to make use of.
That includes:
– Paul Clement, Companion, Clement & Murphy, PLLC.
– Jay Edelson, Founder & CEO, Edelson PC.
– David Lat, Founder, Authentic Jurisdiction.
– Prof. Renée Lettow Lerner, Donald Phillip Rothschild Analysis Professor, George Washington College Regulation Faculty.
– Prof. Eugene Volokh, Gary T. Schwartz Distinguished Professor of Regulation, UCLA Faculty of Regulation.
– Moderator: Hon. James C. Ho, Decide, United States Court docket of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
