$3 Billion Pentagon ‘Accounting Error’ Means More Aid for Ukraine


The Wall Road Journal reported Thursday that the Pentagon has overcounted the worth of the weapons it despatched to Ukraine by no less than $3 billion. The Protection Division had cited what newly produced weapons would value, however Washington has primarily despatched Ukraine older extra weapons from U.S. stockpiles.

The Pentagon says this implies it has an extra $3 billion to spend on navy support to Ukraine—spending that would not require congressional approval. Whereas Congress has the facility to set limits on the worth of weapons the president can ship utilizing this methodology, the White Home has the authority to decide on which weapons to ship and find out how to calculate their worth.

That is handy for Kyiv, which has continued to request help from Washington on high of the astronomical quantity of support it has already obtained.

In March, Max Bergmann of the Middle for Strategic and Worldwide Research  calculated that President Joe Biden’s accessible Ukraine funding would run out by October or sooner, relying on the depth of the spring counteroffensive. However Congress—particularly the Republican-controlled Home—has grown reluctant at hand Ukraine a clean examine. For the reason that starting of the 118th Congress, lawmakers have pushed so as to add restrictions and higher monitoring of weapons despatched to Ukraine. The Pentagon’s accounting error frees up extra money for the conflict, accessible now with none democratic debate.

The timing of this accounting error is suspicious. Senators have been warning that Congress might not conform to a 2023 federal finances that retains up with inflation, and a few Home Republicans have steered chopping support to Ukraine with a view to counteract the rising U.S. debt and to alleviate considerations over accountability and transparency. The federal government might have to impose across-the-board cuts (in any other case often called sequestration) because it did when Congress didn’t agree on deficit-reduction strategies 10 years in the past.

Again then, the navy used abroad contingency operations accounts—emergency funding budgeted individually from the Pentagon finances and immune from sequestration. The present emergency-style Ukraine funding permits the federal government to bypass budgetary pressures, keep away from getting caught up in points like omnibus appropriations, and defend the help from deficit-reduction spending cuts. By reapportioning the newfound $3 billion for Ukraine, the Biden administration may use emergency funding to assist Kyiv unabated, even when the remainder of the federal finances experiences sweeping cuts.

And if the error is not deliberate? That might sign main flaws in Pentagon oversight. If round 7.5 p.c of the practically $40 billion the U.S. has dedicated to Ukraine was accounted for incorrectly, there are doubtless a litany of different monetary miscalculations within the $858 billion navy finances.

Whether or not this $3 billion mistake is a purposeful effort to bypass Congress or an enormous accounting error, it displays a near-breakdown of the democratic course of for navy spending.