In February, after yet one more court docket choice stalling sorely wanted housing growth, Gov. Gavin Newsom declared that California’s landmark environmental regulation is “damaged.”
The California Environmental High quality Act, referred to as CEQA, is meant to guard the surroundings by requiring governments to review and mitigate any harms of growth earlier than they approve it. However as Newsom famous, CEQA has been “weaponized” by “rich owners” (amongst others) to dam housing — usually within the city and suburban areas the place folks have the least environmental influence.
And housing isn’t all that’s on the road. To fulfill the state’s greenhouse-gas emission targets — and safe its share of federal green-energy funding — California must rapidly approve wind and photo voltaic vitality tasks, electrical energy transmission traces, car-charging networks and mass transit. To that finish, in Could, the governor unveiled an 11-bill infrastructure package deal to “assert a distinct paradigm.” Not would we “screw it up” with “paralysis and course of.” Going ahead, the state would commit itself to “outcomes.”
Newsom’s daring rhetoric implied that huge reforms had been within the offing. However the package deal included solely two incremental CEQA reforms, neither directed at housing.
One permits the governor to designate extra “environmental management” tasks for which the courts are alleged to wrap up any authorized challenges inside 270 days. If a case takes longer to resolve and stays caught in authorized limbo, nonetheless, the governor’s invoice supplies no authorized treatment.
The opposite measure seeks to slim the “administrative report” in CEQA circumstances. Typically, compiling the executive report — all the data concerned in an environmental assessment that was obtainable to the federal government and is germane to the court docket case — can lead to intensive delays as a result of it takes a very long time to assemble all of the required paperwork.
Newsom proposed to mitigate this drawback by excluding from the executive report “inner communications” inside an company that aren’t introduced to the ultimate decision-makers. This was a child step.
And but even this minor change elicited outrage from greater than 100 organizations that decision themselves environmentalist. They asserted, confusingly, that the governor’s reform would make it “prohibitively costly and tough to … assemble an administrative report, making judicial treatment one thing solely the wealthy can afford.”
“That is ridiculous!” Newsom vented. Then he caved.
The language about inner company communications was stripped from his invoice earlier than he signed it into regulation final week, changed with a symbolic carve-out for “assembly invites and scheduling communications” — that are by no means related to a CEQA case.
In sum, Newsom’s huge push to reform a “damaged” regulation received him a statutory proper to implore judges to hurry up just a few extra circumstances — and little else.
If you wish to see what actual reform seems like, look north. Washington state legislators voted overwhelmingly this yr to remove environmental assessment for each city housing venture that conforms to a metropolis’s normal plan and zoning legal guidelines. Deep-green Oregon, in the meantime, by no means noticed the necessity for a CEQA-like regulation. It adopted city development boundaries as a substitute, preserving the countryside whereas permitting cities to approve new housing with out the “paralysis” Newsom bemoaned.
Oregon and Washington, in different phrases, selected outcomes.
Oddly, amid all of the Sturm und Drang occasioned by the governor’s infrastructure package deal, Newsom has avoided utilizing his regulatory authority over CEQA. The regulation says the Governor’s Workplace of Planning and Analysis and the state Pure Sources Company could refine and make clear CEQA’s often-vague necessities by issuing “pointers.” New pointers might bolster exemptions for city and suburban housing, make new exemptions for electrical energy transmission or create a statewide environmental zoning map and calibrate the depth of evaluations in accordance with the sensitivity of a given zone.
Sure, Staff Paralysis would throw conniptions and file lawsuits. And plenty of moons in the past, a court docket did strike down an effort to streamline CEQA by means of the rules. However the California Supreme Courtroom later disapproved of that call.
The sphere belongs to the governor. If nothing else, an overhaul of the rules would set the agenda for the Legislature and the courts. If CEQA is actually damaged, it’s absolutely price taking some authorized and political dangers to repair it.
Chris Elmendorf is a professor of regulation on the UC Davis Faculty of Legislation.
