We know how kids learn to read, so why are we failing to teach them?


New Scientist Default Image

CALLIE LIPKIN/gallery inventory

MORE than 5000 years after the invention of writing, you’ll suppose we might have utterly nailed one of the simplest ways to show individuals to learn – literacy is a key ability in most societies, in any case. However you’ll be fallacious. Not solely have scientists lengthy disagreed on the best strategies, however their arguments have fuelled a decades-long, politicised “studying warfare” over the way to train kids to learn English.

In the meantime, giant numbers of kids are struggling to attain the requirements they need to for his or her age. Final 12 months, simply 33 per cent of 9 and 10-year-olds within the US had been assessed as being proficient or superior readers. “The US has achieved poorly in instructing children to learn for a very long time,” says Mark Seidenberg, a cognitive neuroscientist on the College of Wisconsin-Madison. And the issue isn’t confined to English-speaking international locations: there’s additionally confusion about the way to train kids to learn different languages.

A key battleground is a instructing approach often called phonics. Within the US, poor literacy is usually blamed on having too little phonics within the classroom. However, confusingly, researchers final 12 months argued that kids in England are being failed by being taught an excessive amount of phonics. Herein lies the basis of the issue: it’s one factor to grasp how children study to learn and, it seems, fairly one other to determine how finest to show them. The excellent news is that researchers, having begun to enter the classroom, are lastly attending to grips with how they’ll translate their insights to enhance instructing and, finally, deliver an finish to the studying wars.

For 400 years …