The folks of Easter Island have proven that methods of governance aren’t set in stone
Getty Photographs/iStockphoto
Rising proof from the research of human societies previous and current reveals a “staggering kaleidoscope of social experimentation”, says David Wengrow at College School London. It’s tempting to suit societies into neat classes equivalent to hunter-gatherer versus advanced, egalitarian versus hierarchical and democratic versus authoritarian. It seems to be not that straightforward. What’s extra, a society can change drastically if its members select.
One such transition came about on Rapa Nui, also called Easter Island, within the south-east Pacific. The primary settlers established sub-chiefs, every with energy over one area of the island and all subordinate to an total chief. “The chief would have been hereditary,” says Jennifer Kahn on the School of William & Mary in Virginia. “It’s an ascribed place like a monarchy, the place you’re born into gaining that title.” Nevertheless, this centralised system proved unstable, so round 1600 the folks of Rapa Nui overturned it. As a replacement they established a birdman cult. Yearly, warriors competed by swimming via shark-infested waters to a small islet the place they collected a fowl’s egg and swam again. “The primary one which arrives with their egg unbroken turns into chief for the 12 months,” says Kahn. “It’s an achieved place… that warrior may even be someone from a low rank.”
…
