Our peer-reviewed Journal of Free Speech Regulation, which is now two years outdated, has revealed over fifty articles, together with by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU, forthcoming inside per week or so), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and plenty of others—each outstanding figures within the subject and rising younger students (together with ones who did not have a tenure-track tutorial appointment).
I anticipate that many authors are planning to submit articles on free speech to the standard legislation evaluations when the submission cycle restarts in August. However in case you submit completely to us earlier than that, we provides you with a solution inside 14 days (our assure, which we’ve thus far by no means damaged); after which if you would like to have it revealed shortly, we will publish it in inside a number of weeks, if it is sufficiently clear and cite-checked by your analysis assistant. (We will even have it cite-checked for you by one among our scholar staffers, however that takes a bit longer.) This implies your article will be revealed by us, if it is accepted, virtually a 12 months (or extra) earlier than it will be revealed by the legislation journals.
After all, additionally please cross this alongside to buddies or colleagues who you suppose could be . Word that the submissions do not compete for a restricted variety of slots in a problem or quantity; we’ll publish articles that fulfill our high quality requirements each time we get them.
All submissions have to be unique to us, however, once more, you may have a solution inside 14 days, so you’ll submit elsewhere if we are saying no. Please submit an anonymized draft, along with at https://freespeechlaw.scholasticahq.com/. Just a few pointers:
- As an alternative of a canopy letter, please submit at most one web page (and ideally only a paragraph or two) explaining how your article is novel. If there’s a explicit approach of displaying that (e.g., it is the primary article to debate how case X and doctrine Y work together), please tell us.
- Please submit articles single-spaced, in a proportionally spaced font.
- Please ensure that the Introduction shortly and clearly explains the principle claims you’re making.
- Please keep away from prolonged background sections reciting acquainted Supreme Court docket precedents or different well-known issues. We want articles that get proper right down to the novel materials (if needed, shortly explaining the mandatory authorized rules as they go).
- Every article needs to be as quick as potential, and so long as needed.
- Like everybody else, we like easy, clear, participating writing.
- We’re open to student-written work, and we consider it beneath the identical requirements relevant to work written by others.
We publish:
- Articles that say one thing we do not already know.
- Articles with all types of approaches: doctrinal, theoretical, historic, empirical, or in any other case.
- Articles coping with speech, press, meeting, petition, or expression extra broadly.
- Typically not articles purely targeted on the Free Train Clause or Institution Clause, besides if additionally they considerably focus on spiritual speech.
- Articles concerning the First Modification, state constitutional free speech provisions, federal and state statutes, common-law guidelines, and laws defending or proscribing speech, or non-public organizations’ speech laws.
- Articles about U.S. legislation, overseas legislation, comparative legislation, or worldwide legislation.
- Each large, formidable work and narrower materials.
- Articles which are helpful to the academy, to the bench, or to the bar (or if potential, to all three).
- Articles arguing for broader speech safety, narrower speech safety, or the rest.
