Opinion: Why is COVID still killing so many people?


Many immunocompromised and older individuals are nonetheless fearful of COVID. As a transplant infectious illness physician on the entrance strains, I perceive why.

Within the first 5 months of 2023, COVID brought about greater than 37,000 deaths within the U.S., a typical toll from the flu in a whole 12 months. Scientists estimate an annual U.S. COVID loss of life price of at the very least 100,000, dwarfing different infectious illnesses. And the virus continues to evolve: The extremely transmissible XBB.1.16 subvariant (Arcturus), at present making up about 15% of circumstances nationally, is predicted to be the dominant pressure by summer season. Wastewater surveillance can also be exhibiting an uptick within the virus in New York Metropolis and elsewhere.

In the meantime, the federal public well being emergency ended final month, and throughout the nation the pandemic has moved to again of thoughts. It’s not stunning that probably the most weak really feel left behind.

But on the similar time, well being professionals are optimistic about right now’s anti-COVID arsenal. Biomedical advances have revolutionized our capability to thwart critical illness and loss of life from the virus, even because it mutates. The bivalent vaccines are about 70% efficient at stopping hospitalization and loss of life, and if taken within the first 5 days of an infection, Paxlovid or remdesivir are as a lot as 90% efficient. Sufferers hospitalized in 2023 encounter a fine-tuned litany of antivirals and anti inflammatory brokers. We’re on the lowest level within the pandemic for hospitalizations and deaths, and the typical individual being contaminated with COVID now has delicate signs. Most of the protections we’ve developed will help most at-risk folks.

So, why are so many individuals nonetheless dying? And the way can we reconcile these numbers with the huge enhancements in our COVID instruments?

This disparity factors to a continued public well being failure to take full benefit of those instruments and to speak the evolving dangers on this section of the pandemic. COVID by no means handled all teams equally, and a few older folks and immunocompromised people nonetheless face the very best threat of great sickness. However the calculus is nuanced, particularly in mild of remedy advances that needs to be used to guard extra folks.

To begin, the immunosuppressed inhabitants is various. Most of those people, together with sufferers on immunosuppressive medicines comparable to corticosteroids and biologics, reply nicely to the COVID vaccines, which do supply them a powerful layer of safety. Even for severely immunocompromised folks — specifically a fraction of these with malignancies or autoimmune problems who take a drug that depletes their antibody response, in addition to sufferers who just lately obtained a transplant — vaccination is protected and efficient when timed rigorously round their remedy plans. If these higher-risk sufferers are hospitalized with COVID, early use of antivirals comparable to remdesivir with plasma and anti-inflammation remedy will help them get better.

General, the aged inhabitants stays most weak: At present greater than 90% of COVID deaths are of individuals 65 years and older. Nonetheless, on condition that immunity (as measured by antibody response) wanes quickest in that age group, it’s doubtless the unboosted who stay at highest threat, not the whole inhabitants. And analysis means that giving Paxlovid to a larger variety of eligible sufferers would scale back deaths. All of this makes clear that COVID doesn’t must be so dire for older people if we be sure that extra are updated on boosters and have entry to the complete vary of therapies.

That factors to 2 steps our political and public well being leaders ought to take: First, extra vigorously promote the latest bivalent boosters, particularly to populations that want it probably the most. Solely 43% of these 65 and older, and 17% of People whole, have obtained these boosters to this point. Second, scale back limitations to Paxlovid and different early remedy use. This consists of reeducating clinicians about the advantages and dispelling exaggerated fears about Paxlovid rebound (signs re-emerge after use of the treatment for only a small share of sufferers, and sickness can return even for individuals who didn’t take the drug). Suppliers ought to assist sufferers, particularly these at excessive threat, develop a Paxlovid plan in order that they know find out how to get it, what drug interactions to be careful for and any options to Paxlovid they will take.

As well as, the federal authorities ought to proceed to offer funding so that every one communities together with the uninsured have entry to testing, vaccines and early remedy. Initiatives to maintain enhancing our COVID arsenal, such because the $5-billion Challenge NextGen to advertise growth of vaccines and therapeutics, have to be expanded.

Lastly, public well being leaders want to enhance communications — each to fight misinformation and to make the general public extra conscious of accessible sources. For instance, the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention nonetheless gives a map of COVID threat for counties nationwide. Throughout excessive ranges of hospitalizations of their group, everybody ought to put on a well-fitting high-quality masks. Weak populations ought to masks throughout medium ranges and contemplate carrying masks in any crowded indoor areas or on public transit.

All of us have to be delicate to the wants and fears of these amongst us who’re prone to critical sickness from COVID. We nonetheless have work to do — however there’s much less motive than ever that COVID ought to exist in parallel universes. Much more folks could possibly be getting safety and remedy.

Peter Chin-Hong is a professor of drugs and an infectious illness physician specializing in immunocompromised sufferers at UC San Francisco. @PCH_SF