To the Editor:
Re “Subway Killing Each Stuns Metropolis and Divides It” (entrance web page, Might 5):
Politicians and bizarre New Yorkers are pouncing on a debate as as to whether or not a subway passenger who put Jordan Neely, a distressed, screaming homeless man, right into a chokehold, killing him, ought to face authorized repercussions. In the meantime, they proceed to sit down on their palms and never make significant investments in options which may basically tackle the town’s disaster of psychological sickness and homelessness.
Mr. Neely represents simply one of many 1000’s of homeless and mentally in poor health New Yorkers who exist on our streets, in our haphazard shelter system and sometimes within the stations and trains of our subways. We encounter these human beings day by day, and most of us merely maintain transferring on as a result of considering the ethical stain this disaster is on all of us is an excessive amount of to bear.
Jordan Neely is forcing us to ponder that in some ways, all of us share some accountability in his tragic demise.
Cody Lyon
Brooklyn
To the Editor:
Re “Making Somebody Uncomfortable Can Now Get You Killed,” by Roxane Homosexual (Opinion visitor essay, Might 5):
By no means in all of my many years have I felt that my neighbors in New York had been hateful. By no means have I assumed they lacked empathy. In actual fact, I’ve at all times thought-about that, although our metropolis has its share of bigotry, New Yorkers come collectively to assist one another. Now, within the wake of subway passengers harming and killing one other passenger, a homeless man, I’m at a loss.
Ms. Homosexual’s piece does the work of strolling readers by incidents all around the nation the place folks have been significantly injured and killed for making a mistake. However it’s clear that Jordan Neely’s demise is one thing totally different. The media and politicians have raised folks’s anxieties and put them needlessly on edge. That led to Mr. Neely’s demise.
And sadly, in studying feedback on Ms. Homosexual’s piece, we are able to see that empathy has not solely cracked, however flowed away from loads of us. So many feedback say basically “He shouldn’t have died, however …” There isn’t any “however.”
The opposite subway riders ought to have by no means laid palms on him, and New Yorkers are excusing a homicide.
How protected are we now?
Jeremy Rosen
Queens
To the Editor:
As a subway rider, I don’t admire Roxane Homosexual’s gratuitous vilification of those that might have witnessed Jordan Neely’s demise as coldhearted or worse. My kids and I typically worry using the subway exactly due to individuals who scream and threaten and generally kill or shove others onto the tracks. Nearly invariably we keep quiet and pray we’re not attacked.
If some courageous soul chooses to subdue him, he has our thanks. If the threatening particular person dies within the course of, why the speedy conclusion that the extended chokehold was reckless and avoidable?
Maybe within the unspeakable panic and rush of adrenaline in a struggle the place demise is feasible, this was a tragic mistake? The subduer can’t be given the good thing about the doubt? Did it happen to Ms. Homosexual that the subduer could also be simply as upset concerning the demise as she is?
To lump this incident along with those that shoot random strangers who mistakenly ring the improper doorbell is completely unfair.
Ari Weitzner
New York
To the Editor:
As a lifelong New Yorker, I’m appalled at a lot of my neighbors’ and fellow People’ countenance of Jordan Neely’s killing.
This isn’t a harmful metropolis. Dwelling right here has its challenges, nevertheless it is likely one of the most secure giant cities within the nation.
You wouldn’t have the suitable to snuff the life out of somebody — particularly an unarmed, mentally in poor health particular person — since you’re terrified of them. Or offended. Or aggravated. For God’s sake!
If the subway causes you that a lot angst, take the bus, journey a motorcycle, hail a cab.
I’m sick to my abdomen. This hysteria over crime and homeless folks should finish now.
Shahryar Motia
Brooklyn
A Loss at Berkeley
To the Editor:
Re “Protest Is a Battle for Humanities in an A.I. Age” (entrance web page, Might 3):
Your story concerning the sit-in on the doomed anthropology library on the College of California, Berkeley (“Cal” to us old-timers), is one other indictment of the tip of upper schooling as we knew it.
Because the college pivots away from the humanities towards A.I., knowledge analytics and machine studying, it loses its soul within the course of.
How intelligent it will have been to weave humanities into the Gateway, the brand new knowledge sciences constructing, creating an interdisciplinary tapestry that transcends the antiquated siloing of campus departments.
As a substitute, we sacrifice the humanities and humanities on the altar of STEM. What a disgrace.
Maris Thatcher Meyerson
Berkeley, Calif.
The author is a donor to the College of California, Berkeley.
The Silicon Valley Financial institution Failure
To the Editor:
Re “Federal Reserve Criticizes Itself on Financial institution Failure” (entrance web page, April 29):
The Federal Reserve’s overview of its supervision and regulation of Silicon Valley Financial institution pointed to a number of lapses in oversight, with the article noting that the financial institution “had 31 open supervisory findings — which flag points — when it failed in March.”
Clearly, we’d like higher regulation and oversight. Within the meantime, I think that one easy repair would assist spur banks to promptly tackle weaknesses as they’re raised by financial institution supervisors: As long as a financial institution has any open supervisory findings, its workers and administrators shouldn’t be allowed to commerce its shares or train any inventory choices.
Given what we’ve discovered concerning the apparently bottomless venality of financial institution administration, I’d guess that such a rule would assist them resolve supervisory points with alacrity.
François Furstenberg
Montreal
The Heart-Proper Agenda Has ‘Received the Day’
To the Editor:
Re “The Tragedy of Fox Information,” by Bret Stephens (column, April 26):
We’ve heard this plea earlier than: If solely there have been a rational, sincere, center-right get together or information supply!
Mr. Stephens and comparable lamenters don’t point out what such a celebration’s positions could be, aside from basic shifts to extra liberal democratic beliefs.
The very fact is, the agendas of those center-right Republicans have already received the day. We dwell in a rustic dominated by their insurance policies, which at present’s Democrats both acquiesce to or strive vainly to mitigate, whereas often passing a measure that’s insufficient to unravel an issue.
So the wealth hole steadily will increase; the wealthy proceed to evade truthful taxation; the prospects of the poor proceed to worsen; the judicial system incarcerates disproportionate numbers of minorities; military-style weapons proceed to proliferate, leading to an absurd price of mass shootings; debt handicaps the younger and the poor; and the record goes on.
With the agendas of yesteryear’s Republicans in place, up to date Republicans attraction to the frightened, aggrieved, white supremacist, male chauvinist, undereducated people who find themselves impervious to proof and unaware that their precise financial pursuits should not being served.
The one group that addresses the actual wants of our ailing nation are progressives, however the mainstream media pays them scant consideration.
In the meantime local weather extremes turn into more and more damaging — and China grows stronger.
Joel Simpson
Union, N.J.
