Opinion | Mitt Romney’s Tragic Ambivalence


When Romney gave a speech on the Utah Republican Occasion’s conference in 2021, he was ready for boos, however emerged shaken by the sheer depth of the red-faced fury that confronted him. He was, writes Coppins, afraid of his personal constituents. “There are deranged individuals amongst us,” he mentioned, and in Utah, “individuals carry weapons.” After Jan. 6, Coppins writes, Romney spent $5,000 a day on safety for his household.

However Romney isn’t utilizing the announcement of his coming retirement to warn the nation towards the hazard of a right-wing motion that routinely resorts to threats of violence. He actually isn’t defecting from the Republican Occasion for the rest of his time within the Senate. As an alternative, by placing age on the heart of his argument, he’s setting himself above the fray, pretending that each events are equally at fault in bringing the nation to this perilous go. Romney has proven way more decency and braveness in response to Trump than nearly all his colleagues, however on this case, he’s nonetheless pulling his punches.

There’s one thing Hamlet-like in Romney’s temporizing. He desires to defend the social gathering of his revered father, the liberal Republican George Romney, however he’s usually been hesitant about hanging on the venal interloper who’s taken it over. Throughout the 2016 marketing campaign, Romney gave a speech warning of the “trickle-down racism” a Trump presidency would carry, an echo of George Romney’s refusal in 1964 to endorse Barry Goldwater, an opponent of the Civil Rights Act. But, as ABC Information reported, despite the fact that Romney didn’t assist Trump himself, he “mentioned that he wouldn’t be spending the following six months attempting to persuade anybody to not vote for Trump.”

It’s doable that Republican leaders, had they acted shortly and decisively in 2016, might have thwarted Trump earlier than he’d consolidated his messianic maintain over the social gathering’s base. However Romney, like different institution Republicans, underestimated the autocratic menace posed by Trump, or overestimated his social gathering’s patriotic fortitude. It’s a mistake he would make once more.

After Trump was elected, Romney evidently thought he might save the Republican Occasion from the within, abasing himself in a bid to turn out to be Trump’s secretary of state. Coming into the Senate, he tried to chart a path for a post-Trump conservatism whereas ignoring Trump himself as a lot as doable. Whereas promising to talk out about Trump’s worst excesses, he wrote in The Washington Publish, “I don’t intend to touch upon each tweet or fault.” (For that, he had the pseudonymous Twitter account Pierre Delecto, the place he might applaud squibs about Trump’s ethical depravity and evident unfitness.)