Opinion: L.A.’s housing crisis could benefit from tax breaks


Dealing with a persistent housing disaster, Los Angeles is doubling down on changing unused business buildings into residential properties. Final month, as a part of the DTLA 2040 Neighborhood Plan, the Metropolis Council authorised a long-awaited replace to the Downtown Adaptive Reuse Ordinance adopted in 1999, which enabled the manufacturing of greater than 12,000 models of latest housing. The replace would make extra business buildings eligible for incentives similar to streamlined permits and versatile laws.

This would possibly look like the proper time for office-to-apartment conversions: The persistence of distant work has led to document workplace emptiness charges in L.A. However the dramatic enhance in rates of interest over the past 12 months made refinancing loans for workplace buildings very troublesome, prompting defaults and distressed gross sales. “Maturity defaults” — loans which have come due and can’t be refinanced — have surged. Practically 90% of workplace loans maturing this 12 months are more likely to face problem in refinancing.

In downtown L.A., skyscrapers are promoting for half of what they did a decade in the past. Given that prime business actual property costs have sometimes harm the monetary feasibility of adaptive reuse initiatives, a steep decline in workplace constructing costs might be useful in concept. However excessive rates of interest additionally make conversions extra pricey to finance. Measure ULA — the so-called “mansion tax” that took impact this April — is one other disincentive for each promoting and changing workplace properties, making use of a 4%-5.5% tax to transactions for business properties and multifamily housing properties as nicely.

From an area authorities perspective, there may be vital danger in leaving the destiny of those properties to likelihood. Steep declines in sale costs imply steep declines in native tax income. To mitigate this danger, L.A. ought to think about fiscal coverage to tip the size extra convincingly towards adaptive reuse. One strategy value entertaining is a brief property tax abatement program for office-to-residential conversions.

A multiyear tax abatement for eligible initiatives would lower the preliminary prices of adaptive reuse initiatives. A easy instance of a 10-year abatement program would possibly scale back an eligible property’s tax invoice by 100% for the primary 12 months after approval, then by 90% within the second 12 months, 80% within the third 12 months and so forth till the property returns to the total taxable worth of the transformed housing improvement. Along with encouraging new purchases, an efficient abatement program might additionally spur present house owners to transform their buildings and keep away from the monetary disincentive of Measure ULA on property transfers.

In New York Metropolis, a tax abatement program helped produce almost 13,000 housing models in Decrease Manhattan between 1990 and 2020, representing greater than 40% of the entire housing progress within the space over this era. An identical program could also be scaled up in Washington, D.C.

Tax abatements to encourage housing manufacturing have been decried by opponents as pointless giveaways to builders. However these criticisms don’t account for the price of doing nothing.

Contemplate an unconverted workplace constructing that had a present tax valuation of $50 million however would turn into a distressed sale at half that worth in 2024. Suppose that sale ends in a 50% decline in property tax income over the subsequent 10 years. Now suppose that, as a substitute, the constructing is transformed into 200 models of housing whereas benefiting from a tax abatement program meaning forgoing 50% of tax income over the identical 10 years. This conversion to housing might be anticipated, conservatively, to protect the total 2023 valuation of the property. After a decade, the forgone tax quantity is the same as the decline in tax income beneath a distressed sale — however Los Angeles finally ends up with 200 extra models of housing as a substitute of an underutilized workplace constructing.

Past serving to to fulfill Los Angeles’ formidable housing manufacturing objectives, adaptive reuse conversions can present a extra steady supply of property tax income as a result of the housing sector is way more insulated from elements similar to distant work and different financial shocks affecting the workplace sector. They usually can even assist to take care of workplace costs by way of a discount in provide. Each of those forces might place metropolis and county funds at much less future danger.

In Higher Los Angeles, 20% of workplace constructing loans are coming due by 2025 and can should be refinanced. Making a tax abatement program or comparable incentive in time to keep away from enormous declines in property tax income can be a giant elevate for policymakers to tug off. However different huge fiscal packages similar to California’s Mission Homekey — which supplied $600 million within the first 12 months of the COVID pandemic to transform housing for people experiencing homelessness — have been shortly formulated and expanded in occasions of disaster.

The clock is ticking to handle L.A.’s potential “doom loop” for workplace actual property. Decisive motion might enhance housing manufacturing and result in sturdy property tax income that might profit Angelenos for many years to come back.

Jason Ward is an economist, affiliate director of the Rand Heart on Housing and Homelessness in Los Angeles and a professor on the Pardee Rand Graduate Faculty.