Opinion | Even if Erdogan Loses the Election, Turkey Is in Trouble


The Turkish opposition has by no means been as hopeful as it’s immediately. Regardless of the numerous difficulties of the previous twenty years, by no means have so many components lined up towards President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Justice and Improvement Occasion, or A.Okay.P.

The financial system, after the lira spiraled downward in 2018 and not one of the authorities’s haphazard insurance policies might put it again on observe, is in shambles. Poverty has been intensifying, together with among the many A.Okay.P.’s personal base, and disquiet with Mr. Erdogan’s autocratic stewardship is on the rise. The earthquake that devastated the nation in February, inflicting greater than 50,000 deaths and untold harm, seems to be the final straw.

Mockingly, it was one other earthquake, in 1999, that helped convey the A.Okay.P. to energy. Again then, as soon as the catastrophe uncovered the chapter of the mainstream events, Mr. Erdogan’s social gathering was seen as the one clear and competent choice. Now the aura of competency is shattered. To guage from the polls, it actually does look as if Turkish voters could finish the A.Okay.P.’s 21-year conservative and authoritarian reign.

That’s an thrilling prospect, after all. However any euphoria is untimely. If the opposition have been to prevail, it could face the identical structural issues which have stymied the nation for years — and even when Mr. Erdogan is dethroned, his political venture goes nowhere. That ought to be sufficient to curb unbridled enthusiasm. Turkey could quickly be rid of its autocratic chief, nevertheless it stays in serious trouble.

One of the widespread phrases the opposition makes use of is “restoration.” The six events that represent the coalition don’t agree on every part, however there are robust indications of what they need to restore. Two of the opposition events are headed by high-profile former members of the A.Okay.P. One in all them, Ali Babacan, devised the social gathering’s earlier financial insurance policies. The opposite, Ahmet Davutoglu, is extensively credited with its method to overseas coverage. Below these two figures, the A.Okay.P. within the 2000s deepened and popularized the nation’s market-friendly and pro-Western orientation.

However a return to this method is just not attainable within the 2020s. Economically, the worldwide local weather is way much less favorable to the sort of free market economics, counting on overseas direct funding, excessive rates of interest and commerce liberalization, of the A.Okay.P.’s first decade in energy. Geopolitically, the European Union’s stance on Turkey’s accession has modified — roughly ruling it out — and within the wider area, American army and diplomatic hegemony can now not be counted on.

The federal government already knew as a lot. The shift away from Mr. Babacan’s market-friendly insurance policies was successfully enforced by a contraction in world markets a decade in the past. On the worldwide relations entrance, a main purpose for Mr. Davutoglu’s resignation as prime minister in 2016 was that the governing social gathering now not discovered a pro-Western method to be worthwhile. With Russian and Chinese language affect within the area rising, the A.Okay.P. determined to hedge its bets, with out abandoning its Western allies fully.

Lately, the A.Okay.P. pragmatically resorted to various instruments to handle the financial system. It didn’t at all times go effectively. But regardless of the social gathering’s blunders, what allowed the A.Okay.P. to hold on to energy was a large and durable in style base of help. That base was constructed via 5 many years of labor that melded face-to-face interplay and casual ties — serving to individuals manage neighborhood occasions, for instance, or performing as mediators in neighborhood conflicts — with formal social gathering and associational membership. In energy, the shaky however actual advantages of the A.Okay.P.’s ever-shifting combine and match of market-oriented and statist insurance policies cemented these ties with the individuals.

One purpose behind the A.Okay.P.’s persistent enchantment is that — excluding the Kurdish motion and its small socialist allies — no political power within the nation has tried to construct such a widespread rapport with communities. With out a clear various to the established order, many individuals will keep on with the political management they know. The latest guarantees of redistribution made by Kemal Kilicdaroglu, the presidential challenger to Mr. Erdogan and the chief of the Republican Individuals’s Occasion, are hardly sufficient to interrupt the A.Okay.P.’s stranglehold on society.

As an alternative, the mainstream events are caught with standard knowledge. They rely on resuscitating overseas direct funding, regardless of its international decline, and are extremely essential of the A.Okay.P.’s enormous state-led tasks, such because the manufacturing of vehicles and ships. But when the opposition goes to scratch such “nationwide financial system” insurance policies, what’s it going to exchange them with? The dearth of a convincing reply to this query acts as a warning about what’s to return.

But voting out Mr. Erdogan would nonetheless be an ideal reduction. In over twenty years on the helm, he has concentrated energy in his personal palms, imprisoning opponents and stifling the courts. Lately, because the financial system worsened, the A.Okay.P. below him has been ratcheting up its non secular and ethnic agenda, opening its arms to anti-women and pro-violence fringe teams. Defeating this difficult proper flip, and placing a blow towards authoritarianism, is essential.

However electoral victory isn’t ultimate. Within the occasion of defeat, the A.Okay.P. and its allies would little question proceed their hatemongering. In a deeply militarized area, the Turkish far proper’s recourse to identification politics might have devastating repercussions, not least for Kurds, girls, L.G.B.T.Q. communities and non secular minorities. The very best antidote to such a risk is a cohesive, imaginative program for governing — exactly what the opposition appears to lack. Turkey doesn’t want restoring. It must be set on a brand new path altogether.

Cihan Tugal (@CihanTugal) is a professor of sociology on the College of California, Berkeley, and the creator of, amongst different books, “The Fall of the Turkish Mannequin: How the Arab Uprisings Introduced Down Islamic Liberalism.”

The Instances is dedicated to publishing a range of letters to the editor. We’d like to listen to what you consider this or any of our articles. Listed here are some suggestions. And right here’s our electronic mail: letters@nytimes.com.

Observe The New York Instances Opinion part on Fb, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.