Opinion | Daniel Ellsberg on the Papers He Didn’t Leak

This transcript was created utilizing speech recognition software program. Whereas it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it could comprise errors. Please overview the episode audio earlier than quoting from this transcript and emailtranscripts@nytimes.comwith any questions.

Mr. Ellsberg, a number of weeks in the past you made public the truth that you’ve been identified with pancreatic most cancers and that you just’ve determined to forego therapy.

Sure.

And so to start with, I’d prefer to say I’m sorry and ask the way you’re feeling.

Thanks. Properly, I’m not. It’s not an infinite change for me at 92. As John Dean stated to me, if it’s not one rattling factor, it’s one other.

So it isn’t that I’m in opposition to chemotherapy in precept. I in all probability will take some and see whether or not I’m one of many comparatively few candidates for enchancment. However the odds, I’d say, are, say, 5 p.c. And that’s higher odds than I normally cope with politically. So I’m pursuing {that a} bit, however to not the extent of horrible high quality of life.

Properly, I’m very comfortable to listen to that, that you’ve discovered that there are alternatives for you. However I’m additionally curious why you wish to converse to folks like me proper now. I imply, why are you talking to journalists with the remaining time that you’ve?

I’ve lengthy stated to my final breath I can be doing what I can to postpone and avert the chance of nuclear conflict. And I’ll do what I can to the final — until my final breath.

[MUSIC]

From New York Occasions Opinion, I’m Lulu Garcia-Navarro. And that is “First Individual.”

Daniel Ellsberg is legendary for leaking the Pentagon Papers again in 1971. They helped finish the Vietnam Struggle and the Nixon administration. After The New York Occasions began publishing the paperwork, Henry Kissinger known as Ellsberg probably the most harmful man in America.

However a number of years in the past, Ellsberg revealed a secret. The Pentagon Papers had been solely a few of the paperwork he’d copied and never even those he thought of most necessary. There was one other set of paperwork about American nuclear conflict planning that he had needed to be his legacy. However a sequence of occasions involving his brother, a compost heap, the FBI, and a tropical storm stored Ellsberg from ever bringing these different papers to mild.

Now Ellsberg is reflecting on his life. And in opposition to the backdrop of the conflict in Ukraine and rising tensions over Taiwan, he worries that we’re nearer than ever to nuclear catastrophe and that the American public gained’t begin paying consideration till it’s too late. Right now, Daniel Ellsberg’s closing warning.

So in fact you’re most well-known for leaking the Pentagon Papers. However many individuals won’t know that you just’ve spent most of your life centered on nuclear conflict. When did the prospect of nuclear conflict first enter your creativeness?

Actually once I was 13 in 1944. And my social research instructor, Bradley Patterson, assigned us per week to review the next query. What if there advanced what he known as a uranium bomb?

Now virtually nobody in America had just lately heard of a uranium bomb as a result of the topic had been basically censored since about 1940. So he stated supposing a bomb turned potential that was a thousand occasions extra highly effective than the blockbusters we had been then utilizing. How would this have an effect on humanity? Would this be a great factor or a nasty factor?

And my reminiscence is that the entire college students in my class concluded what I did after one week. And it wasn’t that onerous. You didn’t need to be an ethical prodigy to reach on the conclusion this could be a nasty factor for humanity. We will’t actually cope with that.

After which, 9 months later, throughout the summer season, I keep in mind very vividly being on a road in Detroit. I can keep in mind a trolley automotive was going by and was clattering on the wheels. I simply had that reminiscence as I checked out a newspaper on a stand saying Hiroshima, a metropolis destroyed by one bomb.

And my response instantly was that was the bomb we studied 9 months in the past. And we received it first. And we used it.

Truman, when he stated very exultantly, that is the best factor in historical past, our nice triumph of science, which it was, I believed that was a really ominous signal.

There ought to have been extra nervousness or anguish in his voice. He was simply triumphant about it. I believed, it is a harmful improvement.

And that was an uncommon thought, I feel, for People at the moment. As a result of they actually had by no means thought of, they hadn’t spent even per week desirous about what it might imply for humanity to have a bomb this highly effective.

Regardless of his preliminary issues, within the Fifties, Ellsberg got here to see the bomb as a crucial evil. And so with the Chilly Struggle in full swing, he began working for the Rand Company, a navy suppose tank that suggested the federal government on delicate coverage questions. These included what to do concerning the Soviet Union and its nuclear program.

In order quickly as I received to Rand, I used to be assigned to be a reporter, a — what’s the phrase — observe taker at a seminar of a few of their prime thinkers. And I used to be — that summer season I keep in mind sitting at a desk round 11:00, studying experiences that the perfect time for a Soviet submarine assault was at evening. I overlook why precisely, the climate or one thing like that.

And I keep in mind searching at my window, which we had been proper above Muscle Seashore in Santa Monica. I regarded out. And the moonlight was streaming over the ocean at about 11:00.

And the hair on the again of my head bristled. I may see missiles rising out of the ocean coming at that second. It was so, so vivid.

That was, like, a hallucination.

Yeah, effectively, you understand, I may simply think about it taking place.

Proper.

I used to be studying it at that second. So I believed, briefly, that I and my mates had been doing an important work on the earth. We had been saving the world from a nuclear assault by deterring it.

So in these early days at Rand, past studying experiences concerning the Russians, what was your precise job?

Truly, I used to be engaged on a department of economics known as choice idea. My work was how do folks fairly make selections below circumstances of nice uncertainty or ambiguity. An enemy assault, this meant a Soviet assault at the moment, would inevitably be ambiguous.

Our warning techniques misinterpret flocks of geese for an incoming assault, Atmospheric disturbances of varied variety for incoming assault, and false alarms occurred on a regular basis. So how would the president determine what to do when he wasn’t positive there is likely to be an assault?

He didn’t need his planes to be caught on the bottom. However however, if he went first, it was on a false alarm. So this was probably the most consequential choice below uncertainty that any human had ever confronted. In order that’s what I used to be engaged on.

Did you ever really see a nuclear bomb? Did you ever get shut to at least one?

The one time I really recall seeing a nuclear weapon, an precise nuclear weapon, was in Kadena in Okinawa. And there was a weapon on a trolley, the type of factor that carries heavy issues, to be loaded on facet the aircraft. And it was, I might have stated, six or seven ft lengthy.

I put my hand on it. And uncannily, it felt heat. It was a chilly day. However the weapon was heat as a result of there’s radioactivity coming from it. And it felt like animal warmth. It felt as if it had been alive. And that was an eerie feeling.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

As a part of his work for Rand, Ellsberg ended up touring Air Power bases within the Pacific, the place a lot of the US’ nuclear bombers had been stationed. The bombers weren’t even allowed to take off on coaching runs so as to safeguard in opposition to an unintentional explosion. However Ellsberg found that there have been fewer safeguards when it got here to the choice to launch the planes and set in movement a nuclear strike.

This was the day earlier than satellite tv for pc communications. Cables had been run over by trawlers, numerous issues. Atmospheric disturbances occurred. They had been out on a regular basis.

And below some circumstances, as I discovered, you probably have purpose to imagine that this minimize off of communications signifies {that a} conflict is on, you need to do it. Ship them off.

And that was, in actual fact, I found, approved. Not solely on the commander-in-chief stage within the theaters Pacific, Atlantic, NATO, and so forth, they’d delegated in flip. In case your communications are out, you’re by yourself. You determine whether or not you’re at conflict or not, or whether or not it is a false alarm or not. So they’d delegated all the way down to very low ranges.

You’re saying that commanders had authority to begin a conflict?

There are various fingers on the button. Let me put it this fashion. It was not solely {that a} rogue like Commander Jack Ripper, Basic Ripper in “Dr. Strangelove,” on his personal at a base, may ship his bombers off.

“Dr. Strangelove,” in fact, is that iconic satire about how a single rogue US basic finally ends up blowing up the world.

To this present day we hear that the president is the only real authority to execute nuclear conflict plans. He’s an authority. He’s to not be denied by anyone [INAUDIBLE]. He’s not the only real authority below many circumstances. There are various fingers on the buttons.

And the planes had been — in the event that they had been ordered, nothing may convey you again. As a result of they had been afraid that if there have been a code, that is the President, come again, the Russians would get it and would abort our entire assault.

So when you’re on the way in which, you’re on the way in which. There’s no solution to carry them again. Only a few folks knew that.

That’s wild. No solution to flip them again.

As soon as they’re gone, you may’t get them again.

Each facet of that movie, “Dr. Strangelove,” was precise — may have occurred. It was not — it was a documentary, not a parody [INAUDIBLE].

Clearly it didn’t take lengthy after you began working at Rand so that you can begin to suppose that the safeguards in place to stop nuclear calamity weren’t as strong as you may need hoped.

No. That was my specialty, investigating that. And that was the conclusion I got here to. It is a very harmful system.

At first, despite the fact that Ellsberg may see all these issues, there wasn’t a lot he may do to repair them. He was a authorities contractor with none authority.

However when Kennedy turned president, the brand new Assistant Secretary for Protection requested Ellsberg to assist revise the nuclear conflict plans to handle a few of the issues he found on his tour of the Pacific. Within the course of, Ellsberg requested the Joint Chiefs a query.

In case your plan had been executed as deliberate, how many individuals can be killed within the Soviet Union and China? I used to be below the impression from an Air Power good friend of mine that they didn’t have an estimate for the variety of folks killed. So I used to be going to embarrass them by asking whether or not they had an estimate, what their estimate was.

And as a substitute of claiming we’ve got to have extra time or we don’t the reply, the reply got here again in per week, which was very quick for Washington requirements. And it was a chart. It was a quite simple chart.

On the horizontal axis, time in months, as a result of it takes a while for the fallout to kill folks. And on a vertical axis, tens of millions of useless. And the primary determine for the primary week for Soviet Union and China was 275 million useless.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

After I noticed the graph, I had that piece of paper in my hand — I keep in mind very a lot the second — and thought this could not exist. This plan, not that it ought to be stored secret, which it was, however that there ought to be no planning, no system that would presumably accomplish this. This shouldn’t be in folks’s creativeness. That is probably the most evil plan that has ever existed within the story of humanity.

And I’ve tried to grasp the psychology of people that understood that that is what they had been engaged on, like engaged on the Holocaust, you understand. Besides the 600 million we received to was 100 Holocausts. That’s how I considered it.

So when folks say that SS officers had been capable of go dwelling from Auschwitz and play with their youngsters and play the violin and take heed to information and have dinner and so forth, I understood that. That was not make imagine. These had been my colleagues that I drank beer with within the night.

Seeing these charts was a turning level for Ellsberg. He didn’t cease engaged on revisions to the nuclear conflict plan, however he resolved to do every little thing in his energy to ensure they didn’t turn into a actuality.

Then the U.S received concerned within the conflict in Vietnam. And alongside the remainder of the nation, Ellsberg discovered himself consumed by the battle. [MUSIC PLAYING]

In 1961, you see these estimates that lots of of tens of millions of individuals would die, what you name this evil plan. And that plan didn’t come to fruition at that time into nuclear conflict. However we did find yourself in Vietnam.

Sure.

And within the late Nineteen Sixties, you thought the conflict was unwinnable. And also you determine to leak paperwork displaying that the federal government knew the conflict was unwinnable and had engaged in it anyway. These, in fact, had been known as The Pentagon Papers. They usually had been revealed by us at “The Occasions” in addition to “The Washington Publish.” Did you perceive on the time how consequential what you probably did would turn into?

Properly, I didn’t copy the Pentagon Papers as a result of I believed the conflict was not winnable. I feel nearly each American, in the event that they had been there a 12 months or extra, realized what we’re doing just isn’t going to win this conflict. However how concerning the individuals who went to jail fairly than going to Vietnam? They had been the individuals who impressed me to do what I did.

They’re the individuals who put into my head the query what can I do to assist shorten this conflict.

Not one in all them went to jail as a result of he thought the conflict was not winnable. They went to jail as a result of they thought the conflict was mistaken. And that’s what I believed.

And I believed, effectively, since I agree with them about that, shouldn’t I be prepared to take the type of dangers they’re taking? And that’s once I considered copying the Pentagon Papers. However after I’d began, I noticed, effectively, the issues that actually mattered listed here are the craziest, insane, unlawful nuclear plans, together with crises the place we’d come very near utilizing nuclear weapons.

So alongside paperwork concerning the conflict in Vietnam, Ellsberg says he began copying all of his nuclear notes from his time within the Pacific, from his days revising the conflict plan, from the Cuban Missile Disaster. He says he solely advised one particular person what he was doing, an anti-war activist named Randy Kehler, who’d impressed Ellsberg to begin copying the Pentagon Papers and who was headed to jail for refusing the draft.

He was the one particular person I advised. In truth, I didn’t even inform my co-defendant that a few of the stuff he was copying with out realizing it was nuclear notes and drafts and experiences and issues. However I advised Randy as a result of he was on his solution to jail. I believed he want to know that he had had an affect on somebody to do one thing.

So I advised him. And Randy stated, effectively, you understand, we don’t want extra details about Vietnam. We’ve sufficient details about Vietnam. The nuclear stuff is the necessary — you need to put that out.

And I stated, Randy, I agree with you. It’s extra necessary. However Vietnam is the place the bombs are falling proper now.

And if I put out the nuclear stuff, nobody pays any consideration to this historical past on Vietnam. It gained’t have any impact. So I’m going to do this after I put out the Pentagon Papers and we’ve run by means of no matter impact they’ve.

And so I separated all of it from the Pentagon Papers. Didn’t give it to “The Occasions” or anyone else. I gave it to my brother Harry in New York state. And he, it turned out, hid it in — ultimately, in a trash dump, a junkyard.

Wait, wait, wait. You gave prime secret nuclear paperwork to your brother Harry?

Sure.

Who put it in a trash heap?

No, it’s important to have a bit of extra element there. At first he had it in his cellar. After which, I feel when the Pentagon Papers first hit and he realized folks is likely to be coming for him, he put it in a — what do you name it — the place you place vegetation, you understand, trash, and so forth.

Compost, a compost heap.

Compost heap, sure. And at 92, I miss phrases like that.

That’s OK.

So he had it within the compost heap. After which he determined that is likely to be not protected sufficient. And he transferred it in a big cardboard field and rubbish luggage inside rubbish luggage to maintain it — the moisture out. He buried within the facet of a kind of wall of trash subsequent to the street with this range above it so it might determine the place it was.

And the following day, that is now whereas the FBI is looking for me, the following day a neighbor tells him that they’ve seen males probing his compost heap with versatile lengthy metallic rods. So he had moved it simply in time.

Then he advised me throughout the summer season after my indictment, an issue, Lengthy Island, had been hit by a hurricane, or it was one other title for it, a storm or one thing. And it had dispersed the trash and the [INAUDIBLE] on the facet of the street, down the street, down a hillside. And the range had been moved a few hundred yards by this hurricane.

And for an additional 12 months. he and a few mates of his did their most to seek out this. They usually discovered a whole lot of buried rubbish luggage, inexperienced rubbish luggage. However none of them had prime secret paperwork inside.

Have been you mad at your brother?

No. What he’d executed appeared cheap. I used to be sad that the entire nuclear stuff had now gotten misplaced with him. However you understand, what he did was — he did what he may.

So I used to be very, very sad with the scenario. It stored me from being very triumphant concerning the Pentagon Papers. As a result of I felt, actually having failed at what I most needed to do, was get out the nuclear materials.

After sharing the Pentagon Papers with “The Occasions,” Ellsberg spent virtually two weeks on the run from the FBI because the Nixon White Home strategized behind closed doorways.

When Ellsberg did lastly give up, he was charged with espionage and located himself dealing with as much as 115 years in jail.

How are you going to measure the jeopardy that I’m in to the penalty that has been paid already by 50,000 American households right here and lots of of 1000’s of Vietnamese households? It will be completely presumptuous of me —

In the long run, Ellsberg by no means went to jail. The decide declared a mistrial after it got here out in courtroom that Nixon had ordered a break in at Ellsberg’s psychiatrist’s workplace, just like the one on the Watergate that will finish his presidency. A free man, Ellsberg turned an activist in opposition to nuclear proliferation.

That’s after the break.

I’m considering of you as a younger man discovering how defective the techniques are that maintain us protected from nuclear conflict. Do you suppose issues are any higher now, contemplating what a harmful scenario we’re in with Russia and different locations?

We’re in a extra harmful scenario than any time in my lifetime.

You can say the Cuban Missile Disaster, which I used to be concerned in, in actual fact had a comparable threat of all out nuclear conflict. That’s true. Nothing since then.

There are folks saying proper now Putin is completely bluffing and you’ll act as if he’s. I feel that’s asinine. And to say that you just don’t need to have any concern about that this might develop in such a manner. In repelling his aggression, you are able to do it with out restraint.

As a result of he won’t ever perform his threats. And no one ever has. I feel that could be a gamble that’s unconscionable at this level.

I don’t suppose he’s bluffing. He is not going to hit London, Washington, or something. However he’s speaking about small implicitly, speaking about small, tactical nuclear weapons.

So why would he try this? To shock the US and the world into negotiations that Zelenskyy says he’s not prepared to enter. He makes use of one or two little nuclear weapons, however with the impact of claiming, cease. Rethink this. Don’t maintain this going. This factor could escalate. And we’ll all remorse it.

What the Russians name escalating to de-escalate. Trigger the opposite facet to attract again, to suppose, once more, cease it. And negotiate on our phrases.

Properly, given the problem of managing nuclear weapons, do you imagine that the one reply now, at 92, is getting rid of all of them? I imply, can we ever be protected in a world with nuclear weapons?

Properly, effectively, right here I depart from a whole lot of my colleagues within the nuclear motion, together with those that have pressed whole abolition as the one goal value desirous about, that anything is a distraction from that. I disagree with that.

Who would advise the US to dismantle all of its nuclear weapons proper now as quick as they might, it doesn’t matter what Russia did? Properly, I wouldn’t be a kind of. A lot of the world wouldn’t.

If we didn’t have any nuclear weapons, Russia can be attacking Polish bases proper now. There are individuals who say sure, we must always signal the treaty for the prohibition of nuclear weapons proper now. Which might imply we needed to arrange a decent schedule for eliminating all of our nuclear weapons it doesn’t matter what anybody else did, unilateral disarmament with out inspection.

Folks aren’t going to signal on to that to depart Russia as a monopolist of nuclear weapons. However we are able to scale back enormously. You don’t remove nuclear conflict. You make it a lot much less doubtless. Nevertheless it eliminates the potential of killing almost everybody.

50 years in the past you decided to leak the Pentagon Papers and to sit down on the nuclear paperwork you copied. How do you suppose the world can be completely different immediately in the event you’d executed the other and leaked the nuclear paperwork first? I imply, what impact do you suppose these paperwork would have had in the event that they’d been launched then?

That’s a great query which nobody has ever requested me. And I haven’t spent that a lot time desirous about it. However I’ve a bit of.

Above all, everyone is aware of, everyone can see you shouldn’t push the button on all out conflict. However how about threatening it? Or risking it? Taking actions that enhance the chance however remains to be a lot lower than certainty?

It seems people dwell with that very effectively. They don’t really feel guilt. They usually really feel it’s crucial. And it might be dangerous to do it. Nevertheless it’s a crucial evil to have the ability to do it.

So supposing I had executed all of it then. What would have occurred? Most likely nothing. People’ creativeness just isn’t able to coping with powers of destruction of this scale.

You had been born in 1931. And also you’ve seen so many eras and been on the middle of so many consequential moments. What are your ideas about this second in 2023? I imply, do you end up being cynical about our future? Or are you somebody who nonetheless believes that it’s potential to alter the course of historical past, even for one particular person to alter the course of historical past?

Oh, I’m very hopeful. I’m hopeful that my expectations are completely mistaken, as they typically have been. In order that’s not an idle hope. Nobody would have predicted the autumn of the Berlin Wall, Mandela changing into president of South Africa with out a violent revolution. Unattainable.

And now one factor that I noticed as not possible was the Vietnam Struggle ending in 1975. No likelihood. There’s no likelihood of it. It’s not possible. And it occurred. In order that, to me, is a miracle.

You’re asking me now whether or not I’m cynical. It’s not a matter of cynical. It’s what do I feel now’s the practical appraisal of my species and my nation.

You’re coming to the tip of a really lengthy journey. And I’m questioning —

Almost.

— the way you assess your personal influence on this nation?

Properly, there have at all times been folks prepared to take dangers for different folks. Nonetheless, the opposite folks you’re prepared to take dangers for our household, our tribe, or no matter. However there’s at all times a “them” that we actually don’t care about.

There are additionally people who will threat and sacrifice for them, others. How a lot do most American folks care about what number of Ukrainians die? It’s negligible. That’s what I’ve realized.

However there are individuals who do care. And they’re my household. They’re my tribe. You recognize, they’re individuals who go to jail, civil disobedience, who actually protest, who’re activists on local weather and 10 different causes.

So I do suppose, I do know, I’ve been advised by many, that my motion has been an instance for others in the identical manner that Randy Kehler and Bob Eaton, and David Harris, and a whole lot of others, and Rosa Parks very particularly, who I met, by the way in which, and advised her she was my hero — effectively, folks have stated that to me. And I feel to myself once I hear that, for the higher, I hope. Realizing that being modified by me, imagine me, just isn’t a great profession transfer actually and doubtless worse than they even notice.

However nonetheless, you understand, good. They usually’re a part of my tribe. In order that exists. Have they got an opportunity of adjusting issues?

Sure, as a result of it turned out that the Pentagon Papers and the entire anti-war motion did try this, unforeseeably. There was no solution to foresee it, that this could occur. And it occurred by a series of occasions that most individuals don’t perceive to this present day.

So the reply is it’s potential. It’s not not possible. The chances, I can’t convey myself to say that the chances are any greater than low. I can’t convey myself to say there’s so many people. All collectively, we are able to, we’ll change the world. No, that’s not the way in which I see it.

Nevertheless it’s not not possible. And my very own case exhibits that. The problem can be with us all the way in which. However is it value attempting? Sure.

Daniel Ellsberg, thanks a lot.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

My pleasure, actually, my pleasure.

“First Individual” is a manufacturing of New York Occasions Opinion. Inform us what you considered this episode. Our electronic mail is FirstPerson@nytimes.com. And you may comply with. and overview the present wherever you get podcasts.

This episode was produced by Wyatt Orme. It was edited by Stephanie Joyce and Kaari Pitkin with assist from Anabel Bacon. Mixing by Pat McCusker. Unique music by Isaac Jones, Sonia Herrero, Pat McCusker and Carole Sabouraud. Reality checking by Mary Marge Locker.

The remainder of the “First Individual” group consists of Olivia Natt, Rhiannon Corby, Sophia Alvarez Boyd, Derek Arthur and Jillian Weinberger. Particular due to Kristina Samulewski, Shannon Busta, Allison Benedikt, Annie Rose Strasser and Katie Kingsbury.