On Delta tunnel, Newsom should know his limitations



To paraphrase Clint Eastwood’s Soiled Harry within the 1973 film traditional “Magnum Power,” a governor’s bought to know his limitations.

There are limits to the facility even of a governor with no main political opposition and a really pleasant, usually cooperative Legislature.

This time, Gov. Gavin Newsom could have discovered his limitations. Key lawmakers are pushing again towards his late-entry laws to expedite building of a extremely controversial water tunnel beneath the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

As is his sample, Newsom is attempting to jam by way of the laws on the final minute, denying legislators and the general public ample time to evaluate and debate the proposal. That basically ticks off lawmakers, whether or not they’re leaders or backbenchers.

“It feels disrespectful to the [legislative] course of,” state Sen. Susan Talamantes Eggman, D-Stockton, mentioned at a Senate committee listening to on the governor’s proposal this month.

“To attempt to drive one thing by way of on the final minute like this on such a controversial situation, it’s so inappropriate,” Assemblyman Carlos Villapudua, D-Stockton, says.

Newsom waited till Could 19 to suggest sketchy infrastructure laws that he requested lawmakers to cross inside 5 weeks as a part of the annual state funds. What he proposed has nothing to do with the funds. However he can maintain legislators’ pet funds gadgets hostage to their votes for his proposal

Newsom proposed a sweeping package deal of 11 payments that will make it simpler to construct clear vitality, transportation and water initiatives, together with the Delta tunnel.

It could do that, basically, by chopping corners on environmental safety. Lawsuits filed beneath the 1970 California Environmental High quality Act would must be wrapped up in 270 days, until a decide discovered that to be unfeasible. Now such lawsuits can drag on for years.

Governors for six many years have tried to construct this undertaking in some kind or one other and been crushed again by grassroots activists or state voters.

The Delta is California’s most important water hub, serving 27 million folks and irrigating 3 million acres.

“It’s the spine of our state water system,” says Wade Crowfoot, secretary of the state Pure Sources Company. “We’re on borrowed time within the Delta. It has a serious vulnerability to saltwater intrusion with the chance of sea rise in local weather change. And there’s earthquake danger.

Challenge opponents — particularly Delta residents, together with farmers — contend that future saltwater intrusion is one cause the tunnel shouldn’t be constructed. It could siphon water out of the brisker north Delta earlier than it might move by way of the extra saline southern finish because it does now, pushing again salt water intruding from San Francisco Bay.

The saltier water could be disastrous for Stockton, smaller delta communities and farming, opponents say.

As for the earthquake menace, no temblor has ever broken a Delta levee and there are not any main faults beneath the estuary. Anyway, couldn’t a serious quake harm an underground tunnel?

The fishing business and boaters concern that lowering freshwater flows by way of the delta will decimate salmon runs and worsen poisonous algae that clog waterways in summer time.

Villapudua drafted a letter to Newsom and legislative leaders signed by 10 lawmakers of each events asking that tunnel undertaking be faraway from the governor’s package deal.

“It wasn’t very smart to incorporate the Delta,” says Sen. John Laird, D-Santa Cruz, a former pure sources secretary who helped push then-Gov. Jerry Brown’s failed twin-tunnel undertaking.

“A $16-billion undertaking like [the tunnel] will doubtless have important impacts on a big, ecologically delicate and essential space. One thing of that scale shouldn’t be fast-tracked by way of an environmental overview course of.”

Oh, sure. The associated fee: Just about everybody is aware of the value of that 45-mile, 39-foot-wide tunnel could be far more than marketed. And up to now there isn’t even financing for it. Water customers would pay.

Newsom ought to hearken to Soiled Harry.

George Skelton is a Los Angeles Occasions columnist.