To the editor: The U.S. ninth Circuit Court docket of Appeals ruling permitting homeless people to take a seat, lie or sleep on public property if not sufficient housing is accessible is controversial. However in truth, there isn’t sufficient housing for people dwelling in cities throughout the western U.S., so the place are these people alleged to sleep? (“ninth Circuit conservatives blast homelessness ruling, say subject is ‘paralyzing’ U.S. West,” July 6)
In Los Angeles, we’ve been asking the identical query since Martin vs. Boise was determined in 2018. The conservative judges who criticize the ninth Circuit’s rulings on homelessness ought to be asking as a substitute, “Why not present extra low-income everlasting housing?”
As a substitute of constructing boutique resorts, construct low-income housing. As a substitute of offering solely 10% low-income items in a brand new improvement, present 50% or 100%.
Why permit 1000’s of renters to be evicted with little or no alternative to search out alternate reasonably priced housing? Why does a person holding a housing voucher have such a tough time discovering a landlord who will hire to them?
The esteemed conservative judges want to take a look at the basis causes of homelessness as a substitute of resorting to knee-jerk reactions that don’t present options.
Jane Demian, Los Angeles
..
To the editor: Thanks to the progressives who’ve managed to destroy a lot of Los Angeles. What occurred to non-public duty? Vehicles get parking tickets or towed away when individuals go away a car the place it doesn’t belong.
Really homeless individuals ought to be required to ask for assist, get momentary help and be directed to a long-term resolution. That is perhaps a less expensive space to go to and job help. No free rides. If mentally challenged, a requirement for therapy needs to be accepted.
Residents who pay hire or a mortgage ought to be capable of stay in peace. Taxpayers fund the transit system however are afraid to make use of it. Voters preserve the identical “compassionate” of us who’ve enabled this disaster in energy. It’s time to get adults to exchange them.
I’m glad to have moved up the coast from Los Angeles. I hope our individuals keep smart.
Benedict Lucchese, Camarillo
..
To the editor: The outraged response by conservative judges illustrates precisely why homelessness has develop into such an entrenched drawback.
The shortcoming of cities to imprison or in any other case punish these with out houses doesn’t go away native governments “helpless” or “paralyzed.” It merely pushes them to do two issues: Acknowledge that homeless residents are human beings with the rights of every other resident, and give attention to actual options.
Whereas jails and different punitive approaches could briefly relieve the concern homeless individuals typically appear to arouse, they don’t truly assist — and they’re very costly.
What works? Offering housing. Maybe given an absence of choices, extra cities will give it an opportunity.
Tim Goncharoff, Fairfield, Calif.
..
To the editor: Evidently the left and the best are unified on one primary philosophy — that some issues are simply going to be with us endlessly, so simply make the very best of it. No sense making an attempt to control them.
After all, it’s homelessness that the left sees this fashion, whereas the best sees the gun drawback that method.
However at the least we’re utilizing the identical logic. Is that progress?
R.C. Value, San Clemente
