Lawmakers eye changing rules governing ballot measures



When Main League Baseball opened its 2023 season this month, gamers and managers needed to take care of a raft of latest guidelines, together with deadlines on pitchers and batters and limits on bunching infielders on one aspect of the diamond.

Whether or not the brand new guidelines pace up the video games, as meant, continues to be unsure, however it’s sure that they may have an effect on outcomes to some unknown extent. Altering the foundations of any recreation adjustments outcomes, and what’s true in sports activities can be true of politics.

The obvious instance of how altering guidelines impacts outcomes is redistricting – the redrawing of legislative and congressional districts after every decennial census. Republicans maintain a majority in Congress largely as a result of GOP-controlled state legislatures redrew congressional districts to present the social gathering extra alternatives to win seats. For many years, Democrats have accomplished the identical factor once they had the possibility.

This 12 months’s session of the California Legislature consists of three main efforts to vary guidelines governing poll measures, all of which may have an effect on outcomes.

One among them, Senate Invoice 858 – and a companion measure, Senate Constitutional Modification 3 – is the newest of many makes an attempt to take away the legal professional normal’s authority to jot down the official titles for statewide poll measures. Launched by Sen. Roger Niello, a Republican from the Sacramento suburbs, the 2 measures would give the duty to the Legislature’s funds analyst, who already supplies the fiscal evaluation of proposed measures.

It’s a change that needs to be made as a result of latest attorneys normal, all Democrats, have blatantly skewed official titles, with constructive slants for liberal measures comparable to tax will increase and detrimental ones for proposals of conservative teams. Judges have sometimes intervened in excessive circumstances, however typically defer to the legal professional normal.

Not surprisingly, these on the left need to keep the established order so Niello’s two-bill bundle is prone to be a part of different proposed reforms within the legislative trash pile.

The opposite two efforts to vary the foundations governing poll measures come from Democrats and thus usually tend to be enacted.

One, by Sen. Scott Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat, would undo two real poll measure reforms that the Legislature handed and former Gov. Jerry Brown signed lower than a decade in the past. They require native tax and bond poll measures to obviously state their monetary impacts within the 75-word summaries that seem on the poll and prohibit authorities from utilizing summaries to extol the proposals’ virtues.

Native authorities officers hate the reforms as a result of giving voters unvarnished information would possibly make them much less prone to cross such measures. Wiener’s Senate Invoice 532 would shift the monetary knowledge to the voters’ pamphlet, thus liberating officers to as soon as once more use poll summaries for propaganda.

Wiener claims the invoice would “enhance poll measure transparency” however it could have precisely the alternative impact, burying the information and thus making it simpler to cross tax and bond proposals – which, in fact, is the meant outcome.

Lastly, there’s Meeting Invoice 421, carried by Assemblyman Isaac Bryan, a Democrat from Culver Metropolis, on the behest of unions and different liberal organizations.

Because the Legislature turned to the left lately and enacted many new enterprise laws, these impacted by the brand new legal guidelines have more and more turned to the poll to thwart them. AB 421 is clearly geared toward making it rather more troublesome – and even inconceivable – for enterprise teams to overturn legal guidelines by way of poll measures, both referenda or initiatives, by imposing very tight new guidelines on qualifying them for the poll.

AB 421 is prone to win legislative approval, however its final destiny is unsure. Each Gov. Gavin Newsom and his predecessor vetoed comparable proposals up to now.

Dan Walters is a CalMatters columnist.