Hubble tension: Have we been measuring the expansion of the universe wrong?


New Scientist Default Image

WENDY FREEDMAN is staring down the universe. For 40 years, she has been digging into the largest secrets and techniques of the cosmos, patiently whittling down uncertainties to seek out the worth of a quantity that defines the growth of the universe, determines its age and seals its final destiny.

Freedman, who works on the College of Chicago, research the Hubble fixed, a quantity that represents how briskly the growth of the universe is accelerating. We’ve got recognized about this escalating growth since 1929, when US astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered that the extra distant an object was, the sooner it gave the impression to be shifting away from us.

That’s when issues bought difficult. Pinning down the numbers requires correct measurements of astronomical distances. In Hubble’s period, astronomical pictures had been taken by shining mild by way of a telescope onto a photographic plate. Calculating distances from these pictures was tough and imprecise.

Within the Nineteen Eighties, as Freedman was ending her PhD, digital pictures was on the point of revolutionise astronomy as an entire, and measurements of the Hubble fixed specifically. “That’s actually what spurred me,” says Freedman. Within the a long time since, her work has been key to the event of the Hubble pressure – the perplexing method that the 2 most important methods of measuring the Hubble fixed give us totally different values.

Now, after Freedman has spent a long time specializing in this downside, one thing curious is occurring. Her latest outcomes counsel there could also be no downside in any case. If so, it’s going to render pointless a long time of labor exploring new physics that would clarify the discrepancy. Fortunately, Freedman isn’t afraid of just a little controversy.

The Hubble fixed …