To see extra in regards to the articles and authors we have printed thus far, see our http://JournalOfFreeSpeechLaw.org; to submit, go to ScholasticaHQ. Thus far we have printed articles by Jack Balkin (Yale), Mark Lemley (Stanford), Jeremy Waldron (NYU), Cynthia Estlund (NYU), Christopher Yoo (Penn), Danielle Citron (Virginia), and lots of others—each distinguished figures within the subject and rising students. We require simultaneous submissions, however we promise to present a response inside 14 days, so if we are saying no, you’ve got misplaced little or no. After which we are able to publish shortly, which might be significantly worthwhile for brand new items.
We’re additionally keen to publish brief items, if they are saying one thing genuinely new and sensible. We’re not typically fascinated about casenotes that principally restate the details and holding of a case, because it’s uncommon for there to be one thing novel, nonobvious, and helpful there. However one thing that explains how the underlying space of the legislation (e.g., compelled speech legislation, the legislation of threats, the legislation of solicitation and aiding and abetting, and so forth) is modified by the case could possibly be very helpful; likewise for the way different areas of the legislation could be affected by the developments on this space.
In fact, we’re additionally persevering with to evaluate articles which are unrelated to this Supreme Courtroom Time period’s circumstances. (We simply accepted one just a few days in the past, for example, on platform transparency legal guidelines.) However I simply wished to significantly stress our openness to brief articles on these circumstances.
