/i/2005980892.png?fit=%2C&ssl=1)
Thanks for the intensive response.
However switching to EV en masse is definitely not an answer. Fairly a ‘lesser deterioration’. The place you possibly can hardly do with out a automotive in a rural space.
True, the EV will not be a ‘magic bullet’ that solves all mobility issues in a single go. You could wonder if ‘2 vehicles in each storage’ or an analogy is ‘vital’. We’re virtually used to it now, however 50 years in the past we made do with much less. We’ll most certainly not return there and we do not have to. However the ICE contributes _nowhere_ to an answer to this drawback. At most in direct affordability at _this_ second, however that’s primarily as a result of the entire circus round it has existed for many years.
The truth that subsidies nonetheless go to fossil corporations can partly be defined, as a result of the power that’s extracted from them is badly wanted for sustainability.
I am not precisely positive what you imply by this. Sure, greening at the moment nonetheless requires fossil power. However in concept that may not less than be scaled down when the share of greenery will increase.
By ‘subsidy on fossil’ I imply by the best way that the worth we pay for a ‘unit of fossil power’ will not be a sensible worth that features the prices for the atmosphere, as defined right here: https://www.theguardian.c…ollars-a-minute-imf-finds
Identical to the worth of an airline ticket – together with the gasoline prices – has been judged by the required consultants as ‘a lot too low’ for a few years. We depend ourselves wealthy with low costs ‘now’ as a result of we’re burying our heads within the sand for the implications of fossil fuels and the prices that consequence from them sooner or later (and in the intervening time, by the best way, as a result of we’re already busy within the Netherlands, for instance elevating dikes for rising sea ranges and higher administration of extra frequent extreme climate conditions).
After which one other query that I not often see answered: is there a most quantity that you just spend on greening and sustainability? For the time being the adage is: one thing must be executed (that is proper), however how a lot it’ll assist is way tougher to reply
I perceive your argument and your level. I am unable to reply for you the place that most is. The puzzle is simply too advanced for that and I do not know sufficient about it. However what I can calculate with my widespread sense is that persevering with to construct on a fossil trade and mobility will provide _no advantage_ right here both. Shares are shrinking, pumping up is simply changing into harder (and due to this fact dearer) and continues to pollute the whole chain. That air pollution results in all types of different issues. Well being, declining biodiversity, rising sea ranges briefly, ‘ the drill’. Sure change takes effort and cash. And possibly some huge cash. However persevering with with the present and suspending options additionally prices cash; a lot of cash. In direct and oblique penalties.
The rationale why the fossil trade doesn’t but wish to swap to inexperienced alternate options is _exclusively_ pushed by monetary motives _of these parties_. There may be merely a lot cash being made that the foyer is simply too sturdy to push by means of compensation.
I doubt that any EV can doubtlessly change into renewable power (in an inexpensive time)
Possibly not. However _everything_ in that space is revenue. And naturally it must be made reasonably priced in a technique or one other. But when we lastly go full on greening, that can robotically come nearer.
And firms and inexperienced guarantees: I believe the adage is normally: cash must be made in any other case the chimney will not hold smoking. And if celebration A does not, B will. In a global taking part in discipline, a number of guidelines in The Hague or a number of blockades from XR should not going to assist
That’s true in itself, however for my part you might be complicated profitability with ‘company greed’. I perceive that the swap prices some huge cash and that non-profit corporations are a utopia. However that the highest 8 oil corporations collectively $ 200 billion final 12 months achieve have made is obscene to me. https://www.rtlnieuws.nl/…ramco-exxonmobil-gasprijs Have a look again at your gasoline invoice in that interval and suppose for a second how a lot consideration these corporations had to your scenario on the time. They could not care much less.
Even when solely 20% of this flowed into greening the power combine, we had been already effectively on our means. So far as I am involved, it solely emphasizes that they’re ‘in it for the cash’.
Doing nothing will not be an possibility. 95% of local weather scientists are screaming that it is _really actually really_ virtually too late. And naturally we now have to speculate the place it is sensible and might make a distinction. We cannot make it with EVs alone, however with ‘the whole lot as earlier than’ we cannot get a step nearer to an answer and we can pay again the worth double and straight within the close to future.
[Reactie gewijzigd door CaptainKansloos op 19 juli 2023 22:32]
