How a UK river serves as a natural lab for flood defence research


Lake Wooden is a part of Eddleston Water, a stretch of river close to Peebles, UK

Colin McLean

Once I go to a analysis lab, I don’t usually count on to must dodge sheep or get my footwear muddy, however this lab is way from regular. I’m strolling on farmland, about 30 kilometres exterior of Edinburgh, UK. The air is crisp and I can hear a river babbling as I method.

It’s this stretch of river, often known as Eddleston Water, that I’ve come to see, guided by Chris Spray on the College of Dundee, UK. Spray and his group began finding out the river in 2009 and it has been dwelling to a sequence of real-world experiments ever since. They name it a “pure lab” for river science.

Save Britain's rivers

As we watch a dipper hovering out and in of the river in the hunt for prey, Spray tells me that the lab was initially set as much as lower the flood threat going through Peebles, a city of 9000 folks, that sits on Eddleston Water.

Spray and his colleagues wished to learn how they might lower flood threat utilizing nature-based options, resembling tree planting, quite than constructing synthetic dams. Extra importantly, in addition they wished to learn how efficient these strategies actually have been. “Fashions are nice and all, however it’s solely with real-world information that you simply get a full understanding of all the varied components that may have an effect on these outcomes,” says Spray.

Such strategies, also referred to as pure flood administration (NFM), are gaining traction: the UK authorities plans to double the variety of flood discount and coastal erosion initiatives in England utilizing NFM from 60 to 120. However, regardless of this, the proof base for NFM is comparatively sparse, says Spray.

One huge query in hydrology is what occurs once you make a river bendier, in any other case often known as re-meandering. Lots of the UK’s rivers have been made artificially straight, releasing up room for roads and railways, however we now know this additionally will increase the chance of floods. The concept goes that re-meandering rivers permits them to carry a better quantity of water and so keep away from flooding.

But Spray’s group has discovered that, no less than in Eddleston Water, re-meandering alone doesn’t seem to have a serious impact on flood threat. It is because the floodplain surrounding the newly flexible river isn’t significantly giant, so can’t successfully retailer the water that overflows resulting from extra rain. However that doesn’t imply there aren’t advantages: a bendier river has an enormous profit for ecological range, says Spray.

For instance, the group discovered a rise within the variety of spawning habitats for salmon in re-meandered sections of the river. This is among the the explanation why the dipper is attempting its luck within the river at present, says Spray.

A better have a look at the river additionally reveals the varied methods wherein the water appears to circulate – it’s far sooner on the bendier bits, which comprise extra oxygen and may give rise to a better number of insect life. These elements of the river merely appear extra alive than the unrestored sections.

The researchers have additionally studied leaky dams, that are merely tree logs positioned throughout a stream. Throughout regular river circulate, the water passes below the logs, however when river ranges rise the dams cumulatively sluggish the circulate of water.

Spray exhibits me one among these dams, comprised of a dozen logs mendacity throughout a stretch of the river. It appears to be like messy, extra like particles than one thing positioned by people, however Spray says these haphazard logs have in all probability had the largest influence on flooding in Peebles of all of the interventions they’ve trialled. “You wouldn’t suppose it them, however they’re such a straightforward and simple resolution to reducing flood threat.”

Past flood threat, the group has quantified the financial features of its interventions. “Cash talks,” says Spray. The researchers say that NFM has helped keep away from £950,000 value of flood damages within the 10 years for the reason that first interventions have been put in in 2012. However that is far outweighed by the ecological advantages to the area, resembling improved carbon storage and elevated water high quality, which the group values at round £4.2 million. “That is what pure flood administration can do this merely constructing flood defences can’t,” says Spray.

However pure labs include their very own issues. Spray says the lab’s experiments are sometimes a compromise with the handfuls of landowners within the space, quite than excellent science. Re-meandering takes numerous house and farmers could produce other plans for that land, says Spray, so the group’s efforts have been scaled down from the perfect. “If the landowner doesn’t need it to occur, it doesn’t occur,” he says. “We don’t push our luck.”

That additionally factors to a much bigger downside with NFM. For it to work throughout the UK, river practitioners have to foster nearer relationships with landowners, says Spray. However that’s simpler stated than performed and takes time. “We’ve been right here for over a decade,” he says. “The belief has been onerous fought for.”

One resolution is to pay landowners to make use of NFM, one thing the UK authorities is planning on doing as a part of its post-Brexit farming reforms, though the main points haven’t but been revealed. Spray hopes it will assist improve the take-up of his group’s analysis. “However these methods solely work for those who get farmers on board – it’s essential to make it value their whereas,” he says.

Matters: