Dems are intent on rigging the vote again


Gov. Kathy Hochul and fellow Democrats failed spectacularly final 12 months of their bid to snub voters and rig congressional- districts maps. So, after all, they’re attempting once more this 12 months.

On Thursday, an appellate panel will hear their argument for a particular new spherical of redistricting, claiming the maps produced final 12 months solely utilized solely to 2022.

It’s nonsense on stilts, after all, which is why the Albany County Supreme Court docket shot it down.

However this time, devious Dems have a plot that might show profitable — voters be damned.

Final 12 months, Democrats tried to ram via gerrymandered maps that have been speculated to lead to simply 4 Republican Home seats from New York (of 26).

That defied language voters inserted within the state Structure in 2014 that expressly forbid gerrymandering.

The courts then threw out their maps (natch) and appointed a particular grasp to attract up truthful ones, which led Republicans to win 11 seats as an alternative of 4 — and helped return the Home to the GOP.

Now Dems need one other probability to gerrymander, in defiance of voters as soon as once more.

And as soon as once more, their declare — that final 12 months’s maps must be redrawn — flies within the face of constitutional language, this time banning mid-decade redistricting.

Such a transfer would additionally confuse voters, lots of whom may discover themselves in one other new district, after shifting final 12 months.


Last year, Democrats tried to ram through gerrymandered maps that were supposed to result in just four Republican House seats from New York (of 26).
Final 12 months, Democrats tried to ram via gerrymandered maps that have been speculated to lead to simply 4 Republican Home seats from New York (of 26).
Paul Martinka

After all, Dems don’t care about that; they’re decided to rig the maps and lock in Democratic management all over the place.

And this time they’ve obtained an ace within the gap: a Court docket of Appeals (the state’s highest courtroom) led by a chief choose, Rowan Wilson, chosen expressly for his progressive bona fides.

Far-left lawmakers rejected Hochul’s first choose for the place, Hector LaSalle, as a result of they couldn’t depend on him to flout the regulation and do their bidding. (It’s true: They nearly admitted as a lot.)

If Dems now lose on the appellate stage — and so they plainly ought to — they determine they’ll simply get the Court docket of Appeals to greenlight a brand new spherical of gerrymandering that might shut out Republicans once more.


Far-left lawmakers rejected Hochul’s first pick for the position, Hector LaSalle, because they couldn't count on him to flout the law and do their bidding.
Far-left lawmakers rejected Hochul’s first choose for the place, Hector LaSalle, as a result of they couldn’t depend on him to flout the regulation and do their bidding.
Hans Pennink

That’s, they rigged the excessive courtroom to allow them to rig the maps.

The Dems’ one-party rule has saddled New York with excessive crime charges, hovering taxes, ailing colleges and a number of different woes.

In the event that they get away with their new bid to gerrymander and lock in Democratic congressional seats, it’ll not solely snub voters but in addition assist transport their disastrous insurance policies to Washington.